turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- 3D Simulation - Femap Forum
- Equivalence between solid Hex mesh and surface mes...

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-27-2015 06:29 AM

I was wondering, is there a perfect equivalence between these 2 methods of meshing a solid?

Because I found out that meshing a solid with Hex elements can be quite difficult in case of complex geometries since I need to cut the solid in simpler pieces to be able to mesh it.

I solved the problem drawing a surface (corresponding to one of the faces of the solid) and meshing it with quad elements. Then I extruded it:

mesh --> extrude --> element

selecting the whole surface.

Solved! Go to Solution.

3 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-27-2015 07:01 AM

Hello!,

If you create HEX elements using command "**MESH > GEOMETRY > HEXMESH SOLIDS**" then both the mesh & geometry are associated, so you will be able to apply loads & BCs to the geometry and FEMAP will translate to nodes & element faces.

But in fact, you can create as well HEX mesh using **MESH > EXTRUDE > ELEMENTS** (or better **MESH > SWEEP > ELEMENT**, give it a try, is really powerful!!), the result could be apparently similar, but please note the geometry & mesh is not associated, then you will have to run command "**MODIFY > ASSOCIATIVITY > AUTOMATIC**" to make sure both the solid geometry & hex mesh is associated, OK?.

Best regards,

Blas.

Take a look to my block and search for HEX mesh, you will learn how to perform HEX meshing in FEMAP with video included:

https://iberisa.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/mallado-con-elementos-hexaedricos-hex-meshing-iii/

Blas Molero Hidalgo, Ingeniero Industrial, Director

IBERISA • 48004 BILBAO (SPAIN)

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

Blog Femap-NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

IBERISA • 48004 BILBAO (SPAIN)

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

Blog Femap-NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-27-2015 07:07 AM - edited 07-27-2015 07:08 AM

Is the associativity step mandatory or do I have to do it only if I want to apply loads to the geometry?

And also, can I still use the associativity command if I have translated the mesh but not the original solid?

Thank you

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-27-2015 07:11 AM

Dear Olgola,

Not mandatory at all, of course, is up to you, but always I suggest to have mesh & geometry associated, this way everyhing is more easy to apply loads & constraints to geometry instead to go to nodes & elements, specially when pressure loads are involved. The ASSOCIATIVITY command is really powerful and easy to use, give it a try!.

Best regards,

Blas.

Blas Molero Hidalgo, Ingeniero Industrial, Director

IBERISA • 48004 BILBAO (SPAIN)

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

Blog Femap-NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

IBERISA • 48004 BILBAO (SPAIN)

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

Blog Femap-NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2017 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc