turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- 3D Simulation - Femap Forum
- advanced explicit analysis (no -24) time consumpti...

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 04:29 AM

Hello everyone,

I have run advanced explicit analysis (no -24) on last Friday. Unfortunately it is still running. My model consist 134842 elements.

I have chosen 100 number of steps with 0.01 time increments and 1 – output every nth step. In addition, in the output, I have just selected displacement, stress and forces.

Does anybody have any idea how long dynamic explicit takes time when element are more than 100,000? Attached please see the pic of analysis.

Many thanks in advance.

8 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 04:50 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:08 AM

Hi Stuart,

Attached please find the pic of the log screen and nastran solver parameter.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:24 AM

It has been a while since I have used SOL701. However, from memory the inputs you have used as the "time step" are not what you may think they are.

The actual computational time step is being calculated by the program and this is based of:

T = L/C

Where L is the characteristic material length and C id the material wave speed.

If you have a single small or excessively distorted element this will increase the solution time greatly. (I believe you should be able to find this element or length in the F06).

There are ways to reduce the solution time - global mass scaling - but I wouldnt try these methods until you know exactly how to implement them correctly. Do you need to use SOL701?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:31 AM

Hi stuart,

do you know any tutorial aboue global mass scaling.

well, i wanted to perform crushing analysis under short interval of time.

I have run already static and advanced static, So Now I wanted to run advanced explicit to see the difference in results.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:33 AM

Post a screenshot of the actual model, with mesh etc.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:40 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 05:52 AM

A single small tet is likely reducing the stable time step considerably, but even if your elements where uniform, with that complex geometry - it is always going to take a long time to solve.

Also, SOL701 only supports 4-node tets, which arent the most accurate elements - so even if the solution does solve I would spend a large amount of time querying the results.

I would start with a cylinder using uniform shell elements and conduct your comparisons to get an idea of the solve times, results etc. then do the same with solid hex elements and finally move onto your model - all being said I think you will still have a long solve time.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-01-2017 06:12 AM

Thank you Stuart for being " UTTERLY BUNGLING".

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2017 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc