turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- 3D Simulation - Simcenter 3D Forum
- Linear vs Non Linear Stress for Fatigue

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

Solved!
Go to solution

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-02-2015 07:17 PM - edited

New to fatigue analysis and have a few fundamental questions of anyone would care to comment. Based on what I think I know is that a (S-N) stress based approach is best for high cycle fatigue and a (E-N) strain based approach for low cycle fatigue. The cut off generally being around 100K cycles.

__Stress Based Approach__

For high cycle fatigue I am using a (S-N) approach because the linear stresses are below 70% of yield and in the elastic part of the material curve. I clearly understand this no problem.

__Strain Based Approach__

When the linear stresses are over yield this is where I am still unclear and have questions.

- Should I always use a strain based approach when the stress is over yield?
- Should I use the above linear stresses, over yield, with an elastic plastic correction?
- Should I use non-linear stress results with no elastic plastic correction.

Any comments would be appreciated.

Solved! Go to Solution.

Labels:

4 REPLIES

Solution

Solution

Accepted by Ganesh_S (Community Manager)

09-03-2015
03:11 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-03-2015 12:12 PM

cadguy,

You should be using strain life when the maximum stress exceeds the yield strength of your material.

You can use either linear and nonlinear results, and in both cases the software will apply an elastic-plastic correction. You need to check on 'Use Non-Linear Results' in the Solve Options tabs for the nonlinear results to be considered.

If you elect to use nonlinear results, you should not be defining a notch factor.

Phil

Philippe Tremblay

phillippe.tremblay.ext@siemens.com

www.mayahtt.com

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-11-2015 08:01 AM

Thanks for the feedback. When I use the non linear stress option should i use the transient durbaility option? If so how does the force get fully reversed?

I could run the load non linear and reverse the load to get a full cycle, however, I have 5 load points so it is very complex?

Would you just take the peak stress from the non linear and full reverse it kind of like a linear analysis?

Thanks

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-23-2015 09:15 AM

You can extract stresses/strains from either a static or a transient solution. You would define a transient or static durability event accordingly.

In a transient event, the reversals are determined by the response history and by the subsequent rainflow counting.

In a static event, you define the reversals by selecting a pattern type, full or half cycle. The stresses (linear or nonlinear) follow the same pattern.

Philippe Tremblay

phillippe.tremblay.ext@siemens.com

www.mayahtt.com

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11-06-2015 03:01 AM

Dear cadguy, hi Phillippe,

let me add a little on the background of strain-life approaches.

First, everything about the limitation of the range of usage of stress-life approach is correct.

People found some 50-70 years ago that indeed the damage correlates better with the local strain history than with the local stress history, so above yieling one should have a look at strain-life approaches.

But for application, people also see that the yielding is typically only local (as one has does not design parts that see permanent plastic deformation in the range of fatigue loads). Therefore the strain-life methods also include approximation formulae (typically Neuber or ESED) that locally give a good approximation for the plastic behavior. In most cases this means elasic FE is enough. From our experience transient results are needed whenever

- geometric non-linearities (e.g. contact)
- high pre-loads (e.g. bolting)
- large deformations

play a role. I.e. effects that can not be handled by locallized approximation.

Hope this helps

Michael

Let me also invite you to our parallel forum

http://community.plm.automation.siemens.com/t5/LMS

Dr. Michael Hack

Product Line Manager Durability Solutions

Simulation & Testing Solution

Siemens PLM Software

Dr.Michael Hack

Business Product Line Manager Durability

Simulation and Testing Solutions

Business Product Line Manager Durability

Simulation and Testing Solutions

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2017 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc