turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- CAE Simulation - NX Nastran Forum
- condense stiffness matrix

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

02-03-2016 11:30 AM

Hello People,

I'm doing a CMS for a large model. I'm processing my results in Matlab for a target mode selection. My problem is, to solve the generalized eigenvalue problem in matlab my mass and stiffness matrices from NX should be the same size, and they are not.

In my SOL 103 real eigenvalues solution i obtain in a .pch file my original stiffness and mass matrices:

in the stiffness matrix all the nodes have 6 DOF

in the mass matrix all the nodes except those from RBE elements have 3 DOF, the former ones 6 DOF, so no rotational DOF for normal nodes.

as i understand i would require to make a static condensation of the matrix K, so Kred = Ktt - Ktr*(Krr)^-1*Krt. Where subscript t are translational DOF and r are rotational DOF.

As i do this in matlab and compare with the CMS (Craig-Bampton) from NX i obtain different results, specifically for the fixed interface modes. I'd like to know if there is a parameter or a easy way to make this static reduction. I have tried making a DOFset restraining the additional DOF of my stiffness matrix but this i would need to do it for all the nodes and it's no practical.

I would really much appreciate help,

best regards,

Jaime.

Labels:

2 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

05-23-2016 07:03 PM

I am currently facing the same problem. My model is a lumped mass-spring system. Performed CMS (Fixed-Boundary) reduction and my mass and stiffness matrices(from .pch file) are not of the same size.

Did you find any solution? If so, any help on this matter would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Shilpa

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

05-25-2016 12:12 PM

I still can't find a solution. The only thing I know is that the type of

elements you use define how many degrees of freedom you'll have, so you

won't face this problem if you use only CHEXA elements for instance. But if

you use shell elements they'll have 6 DOF but only 3 DOF with mass. I

haven't tried to disable the DOF, maybe that could work, but i'm also not

sure how to do it. Please tell me if you come with a solution

--

Jaime Andrés Bretón

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2018 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc