turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- CAE Simulation - NX Nastran Forum
- rigid body modes with linear contacts

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-18-2009 04:39 AM

Hello,

I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis without constraints

produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz (this is a requirement).

This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties. I cannot

obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3 rigid body

modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body modes but the

ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the reason?

Thanks

Marco

5 REPLIES

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-18-2009 05:27 AM

Dear Vernon,

I'm using NX.Nastran 6.1 included in FEMAP 10.0.2. Thanks for the advice, I'll try

to change contact parameters, usually I leave them at default values given by FEMAP.

It's been a problem using contacts, because I always have to provide math check

results, and they are often not good with contacts, especially for rigid body modes

frequencies. Usually I perform modal analysis setting all contacts as glued.

Regards

Marco

"Vernon McKenzie"

>Marco,

>

>The modes performance of NX/Nastran is sensitive to the glue parameters (the

>

>normal and tangetial penalty factors). You will need to experiment with

>these to produce factors which are satisfactory for both structural and

>modes performance. Which version of NX Nastran are you using? Also, if you

>

>have contacts, are you expecting the modes when the parts are in the

>contacted or non-contacted consdiition?

>

>Regards,

>

>Vernon McKenzie.

>

>"Marco"

>>

>> Hello,

>>

>> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis without

>

>> constraints

>> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz (this

>is

>> a requirement).

>> This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties.

>

>> I cannot

>> obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3

>

>> rigid body

>> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body modes

>

>> but the

>> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the

>> reason?

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> Marco

>>

>>

>>

>

>

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-18-2009 05:29 AM

The modes performance of NX/Nastran is sensitive to the glue parameters (the

normal and tangetial penalty factors). You will need to experiment with

these to produce factors which are satisfactory for both structural and

modes performance. Which version of NX Nastran are you using? Also, if you

have contacts, are you expecting the modes when the parts are in the

contacted or non-contacted consdiition?

Regards,

Vernon McKenzie.

"Marco"

>

> Hello,

>

> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis without

> constraints

> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz (this is

> a requirement).

> This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties.

> I cannot

> obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3

> rigid body

> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body modes

> but the

> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the

> reason?

>

> Thanks

>

> Marco

>

>

>

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-18-2009 05:37 AM

I can give you only my opinion, only nx nastran developpers knows the reason. According your comments one point could be in the stabilization methods of the stiffness matrix used by the surface-to-surface contact algorithms. Fortunately the user can control the contact parameters, edit the SOL103 solution > Case Control > there you have both the "Contact Parameters" and "Glue Parameters" modelling objects (see image attached). You will have to play with "penalty" values and see how different values affect to the rigid body frequency results.

Also, I strongly suggest to avoid the use of Glue contact when possible, the work-around here is to use the classical method of merging nodes (making geometry coincident and performing splitting), don't pass the "brown" to the nx nastran solver if a solution to the problem at mesh level is available. Also, you will pay a ticked in time during nx nastran solving refining source region mesh, etc...

Best regards,

Blas.

--

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blas Molero Hidalgo

Ingeniero Industrial

Director

IBERISA

Edificio Ercilla

Rodríguez Arias 23, 3º - Dpto. 19

48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)

Tel. (+34) 94 410 65 50

Fax. (+34) 94 470 26 34

E-mail: info@iberisa.com

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

"Marco"

>

> Hello,

>

> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis without constraints

> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz (this is a requirement).

> This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties. I cannot

> obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3 rigid body

> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body modes but the

> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the reason?

>

> Thanks

>

> Marco

>

>

>

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-18-2009 06:00 AM

Dear Blas,

thanks for the answer. I agree with you for glued contacts, I set them just to spend

less time but then this advantage is overcome by the problems in analysis and post-processing...

Anyway I'm trying to change parameters (penalty factors) but frequency results are

always identical.

Marco

"Blas Molero Hidalgo"

>

>

>

>------=_NextPart_001_0025_01CA3854.6E671C60

>

>Dear Marco,

>I can give you only my opinion, only nx nastran developpers knows the =

>reason. According your comments one point could be in the stabilization =

>methods of the stiffness matrix used by the surface-to-surface contact =

>algorithms. Fortunately the user can control the contact parameters, =

>edit the SOL103 solution > Case Control > there you have both the =

>"Contact Parameters" and "Glue Parameters" modelling objects (see image =

>attached). You will have to play with "penalty" values and see how =

>different values affect to the rigid body frequency results.

>

>

>

>Also, I strongly suggest to avoid the use of Glue contact when possible, =

>the work-around here is to use the classical method of merging nodes =

>(making geometry coincident and performing splitting), don't pass the =

>"brown" to the nx nastran solver if a solution to the problem at mesh =

>level is available. Also, you will pay a ticked in time during nx =

>nastran solving refining source region mesh, etc...

>

>Best regards,

>Blas.

>

>--=20

>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>Blas Molero Hidalgo

>Ingeniero Industrial

>Director

>=20

>IBERISA

>Edificio Ercilla

>Rodr=EDguez Arias 23, 3=BA - Dpto. 19

>48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)

>Tel. (+34) 94 410 65 50

>Fax. (+34) 94 470 26 34

>E-mail: info@iberisa.com

>WEB: http://www.iberisa.com

>

>"Marco"

>news:4ab34741$1@bbsnotes.ugs.com...

>>=20

>> Hello,

>>=20

>> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis =

>without constraints

>> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz =

>(this is a requirement).

>> This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact =

>properties. I cannot

>> obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get =

>3 rigid body

>> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body =

>modes but the

>> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the =

>reason?

>>=20

>> Thanks

>>=20

>> Marco

>>=20

>>=20

>>

>------=_NextPart_001_0025_01CA3854.6E671C60

>

>

>

><meta http-equiv="3DContent-Type" content="3D"text/html;" />>charset=3Diso-8859-1">

><meta content="3D"MSHTML" 6.00.6001.18294="" />

>

>

>

>

Dear Marco,

>

I can give you only my opinion, only =

>nx nastran=20

>developpers knows the reason. According your comments one point =

>could be in=20

>the stabilization methods of the stiffness matrix used by the =

>surface-to-surface=20

>contact algorithms. Fortunately the user can control the contact =

>parameters,=20

>edit the SOL103 solution > Case Control > there you have both the =

>"Contact=20

>Parameters" and "Glue Parameters" modelling objects (see image =

>attached). You=20

>will have to play with "penalty" values and see how different values =

>affect to=20

>the rigid body frequency results.

>nx nastran=20

>developpers knows the reason. According your comments one point =

>could be in=20

>the stabilization methods of the stiffness matrix used by the =

>surface-to-surface=20

>contact algorithms. Fortunately the user can control the contact =

>parameters,=20

>edit the SOL103 solution > Case Control > there you have both the =

>"Contact=20

>Parameters" and "Glue Parameters" modelling objects (see image =

>attached). You=20

>will have to play with "penalty" values and see how different values =

>affect to=20

>the rigid body frequency results.

>

>

>

>

Also, I strongly suggest to avoid the =

>use of Glue=20

>contact when possible, the work-around here is to use the classical =

>method of=20

>merging nodes (making geometry coincident and performing splitting), =

>don't pass=20

>the "brown" to the nx nastran solver if a solution to the problem at =

>mesh level=20

>is available. Also, you will pay a ticked in time during nx nastran =

>solving=20

>refining source region mesh, etc...

>use of Glue=20

>contact when possible, the work-around here is to use the classical =

>method of=20

>merging nodes (making geometry coincident and performing splitting), =

>don't pass=20

>the "brown" to the nx nastran solver if a solution to the problem at =

>mesh level=20

>is available. Also, you will pay a ticked in time during nx nastran =

>solving=20

>refining source region mesh, etc...

>

>

Best regards,

>

Blas.

>

>size=3D2>--=20

>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blas Molero Hidalgo

Ingeniero=20

>Industrial

Director

IBERISA

Edificio =

>Ercilla

Rodr=EDguez=20

>Arias 23, 3=BA - Dpto. 19

48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)

Tel. (+34) 94 410 =

>65=20

>50

Fax. (+34) 94 470 26 34

E-mail: >href=3D"mailto:info@iberisa.com">>size=3D2>info@iberisa.com

>size=3D2>WEB: >href=3D"http://www.iberisa.com">>size=3D2>http://www.iberisa.com

>

>

"Marco" <>href=3D"mailto:aaa@drt.ui">>size=3D2>aaa@drt.ui>face=3DArial size=3D2>> escribi=F3 en el mensaje de noticias =

>>href=3D"news:4ab34741$1@bbsnotes.ugs.com">>size=3D2>news:4ab34741$1@bbsnotes.ugs.com>size=3D2>...

> >>href=3D"news:4ab34741$1@bbsnotes.ugs.com">>size=3D2>news:4ab34741$1@bbsnotes.ugs.com>size=3D2>...

> =

>Hello,

>=20

>

> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal =

>analysis=20

>without constraints

> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a =

>

>frequency < 0.001 Hz (this is a requirement).

> This FEM =

>contains=20

>linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties. I =

>cannot

> obtain=20

>6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3 rigid=20

>body

> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 =

>rigid body=20

>modes but the

> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of =

>1E-1 Hz.=20

>What is the reason?

>

> Thanks

>

> =

>Marco

>=20

>

>

>

>

>------=_NextPart_001_0025_01CA3854.6E671C60--

>

N/A

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

09-21-2009 11:33 AM

Marco,

If the two faces that you are gluing together are not coincident, the original glue

formulation can lead to artificial rotational energy since it is similar in concept

to a CELASi element created between two non-coincident grids.

NX Nastran 6.1 introduces a new "weld like" glue algorithm that models a glue connection

more like a CWELD element so that it can transfer moment in situations where the

two faces are not coincident.

See the "Surface to Surface Glue Enhancements" chapter in the NX Nastran 6.1 Release

Guide. Be sure to set GLUETYPE=2 to use this method.

Regards,

Jim

"Marco"

>

>Dear Vernon,

>

>I'm using NX.Nastran 6.1 included in FEMAP 10.0.2. Thanks for the advice,

>I'll try

>to change contact parameters, usually I leave them at default values given

>by FEMAP.

>It's been a problem using contacts, because I always have to provide math

>check

>results, and they are often not good with contacts, especially for rigid body

>modes

>frequencies. Usually I perform modal analysis setting all contacts as glued.

>

>Regards

>

>Marco

>

>"Vernon McKenzie"

>>Marco,

>>

>>The modes performance of NX/Nastran is sensitive to the glue parameters (the

>>

>>normal and tangetial penalty factors). You will need to experiment with

>

>>these to produce factors which are satisfactory for both structural and

>>modes performance. Which version of NX Nastran are you using? Also, if

>you

>>

>>have contacts, are you expecting the modes when the parts are in the

>>contacted or non-contacted consdiition?

>>

>>Regards,

>>

>>Vernon McKenzie.

>>

>>"Marco"

>>>

>>> Hello,

>>>

>>> I'm trying to perform a check on a FEM, to see if a modal analysis without

>>

>>> constraints

>>> produces the first 6 rigid body modes with a frequency < 0.001 Hz (this

>>is

>>> a requirement).

>>> This FEM contains linear contacts, part glued and part contact properties.

>>

>>> I cannot

>>> obtain 6 modes within requirements: if I use contact properties I get 3

>>

>>> rigid body

>>> modes only, and if I set all contacts as glued I get 6 rigid body modes

>>

>>> but the

>>> ones from 4 to 6 are in the order of magnitude of 1E-1 Hz. What is the

>

>>> reason?

>>>

>>> Thanks

>>>

>>> Marco

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>

>

>

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2018 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc