07-21-2016 12:37 PM - edited 07-21-2016 12:38 PM
Hi,
I'm looking for a good way to profile my parts using a trochoidal milling pattern. I can get by with what I use but I would like to clean up a lot of my tool path. Currently I use cavity milling with the trochoidal pattern to do this but no matter what settings I use, my path is never optimal. I have been playing around with this for quit some time now. The Z level Profile option does not have a trochoidal option. For the sake of my cutters I would like to achieve a constant stepover when roughing the outside of my parts.
Furthermore, I don'y want to have to purchase 3rd party software like volumill to achieve this. I there anyways to achieve what I have described about above?
I will attach a video showing the unnecessary tool movements. I will circle with my mouse the areas I'm talking about.
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-21-2016 06:37 PM
What don't you like in the current path - extra loops?
Can you post a part file with your current path?
It would make it much easier to try some options that might help.
07-22-2016 07:14 AM
07-22-2016 07:31 AM
If you created wave links from the bodies in the components, then no.
Production: NX10.0.3, VERICUT 8.1, FBM, MRL 3.1.7 | TcUA 10.1 MP7 Patch 0 (10.1.7.0) | TcVis 10.1
Development: VB.NET, Tcl/Tk Testing: NX12.0 Preparing: NX12.0
Employees of the customers, together we are strong
How to Get the Most from Your Signature in the Community
NX Customization - Best Practice Guide
07-22-2016 08:56 AM
Okay here is what I have. The biggest concern I have is that the tool can not exceed 60% of its step over. This forces me to keep the Stepover Limit % to 100%. Increasing this gets rid of the a lot of the extra tool movements but then it burys my tool to deap.
I also tried changing the stepover to 30% and then changing the stepover limit to 150% to achieve my goal of never exceeding 60% stepover. This works but it doubles my toolpath. All in all I can not figure out a good way to do this. I don't understand why in many instances, when the tool is leaving the part that it feels the need to circulate out. 5% of the tool could be engage at that moment and it still cirulates.
Thanks for the help!
07-22-2016 12:09 PM - edited 07-22-2016 12:10 PM
What kind of material is this?
If it was me and this is a hard material I'd use a 3/8 or 1/2 tool, go full depth and use a 8-10% stepover with a 6 flute tool.
If this is aluminum I'd do the same strategy but bump use a 3flute aluminum cutter and change the stepover to 20%.
Toolpath using Cavity mill and transfer/rapid settings
07-22-2016 12:19 PM - edited 07-22-2016 12:22 PM
They're just basic steel. Could you send me the part file you used to program this tool path with. I didn't know without volumill that toolpath like that was possible. I'd like to see how it handles the circular motions with your setting. This looks really good!!!
Thank you
07-22-2016 12:24 PM - edited 07-22-2016 12:26 PM
I have the volumill plugin and while cavity mill isn't perfect for mild steel this will be good.
I bought volumill when I had a huge job in 17-4 and s7 show up. Cycle time drop was maybe 10% compared to a good cavity mill toolpath but the tools lasted a lot longer due to the precise control of the engagement.
07-22-2016 12:42 PM
07-25-2016 09:56 AM - edited 07-25-2016 01:20 PM
@Dstryr nice job with the trochoidal! You can do quite a bit with this pattern, once you learn to adjust the cutting parameters.
Since our adaptive milling is coming along nicely, I asked @jkane1 to try it on this part. It's hard to see the cutting path because most of it is below the green low height transfers, so I made a movie to show the material removal.