I use 5 axis mill operation (veriable contour).Then I select workpiece as part geometry. When I generated. Tool path is confused. then change to MCS as part geometry. It is ok. Why?
Go to Solution.
Can you provide a sample part file, since there are too many drive methods you can use to solve this from the top of ones head.
Production: NX10.0.3, VERICUT 8.1, FBM, MRL 3.1.4 | TcUA 10.1 MP7 Patch 0 (10.1.7.0) | TcVis 10.1Development: VB.NET, Tcl/Tk Testing: NX12.0 Preparing: NX12.0Employees of the customers, together we are strong How to Get the Most from Your Signature in the Community
Many of the drive methods in surface contouring do not require PART geometry. With PART, the drive path is project to the PART, but without PART, the drive path is used without projection.
My guess is that when you change the geometry parent to MCS, there is no PART geometry, so you are seeing a non-preojected path.