Synchronous Technology and Live Rules

by MLombard ‎10-18-2013 02:00 AM - edited ‎10-18-2013 01:28 PM (4,863 Views)

Solid Edge provides no end of potential topics for blog articles. Finding a topic I like is not a difficulty. Narrowing it down to just one idea is probably the hardest part. The next hardest part is avoiding my own inclination to gravitate toward (and away from) certain topics. There are a couple of topics that have been conspicuously absent from the articles I’ve written to this point. One of them is obviously drawings. I’m trying to build up to my first Solid Edge draft article, but I keep finding other things in part and assembly modeling that interest me more.  I know I have to talk about drawings, but I just haven’t found the right way to get started there. In my freelance work, I rarely created drawings. The parts were highly 3D, and the next step in the process was building a mold. Sometimes I would do a drawing just to get a mold quoted. I promise, I will get started on some draft articles, but not today.

 

Today, I’m going to cover the other topic that I’m sure some have been waiting for – Live Rules. To be honest, I’ve kind of avoided Live Rules, just because I didn’t feel I was ready for them. I think when you start learning, you can use the Steering Wheel for simple stuff, but you might do better to establish design intent with PMI (dimensions on the 3D model), and Face relations. Those concepts are more static, and if you’re coming from a history-based background, I think applying dimensions and relations to the 3D model is an easy enough conceptual leap. Live Rules is maybe too much for a beginning user to bite off.

 

It might be safe to say that Live Rules are the biggest part of Synchronous Technology that makes it more than just simple direct edit. Live Rules have evolved through the 6 iterations of Synchronous Technology.

 

Live Rules makes assumptions about your model. We all know that assumptions can easily be wrong, but these are right often, and for the times when they aren’t it allows you to turn off the ones that are wrong.

 

For example, if the faces of your model start out perpendicular to the base planes, Live Rules by default assume that you want to keep them perpendicular. If that’s not the case, you can turn that rule off. And there’s even a hotkey for that.

 

If a hole is concentric with a boss, Solid Edge assumes by default that during any change you make you will want to keep the hole concentric with the boss. So in this situation, you can move the boss or the hole, and they will move together. There is no parent/child limitation for which one has to be edited. If it turns out that you want to make the hole off-center from the boss, then you can turn off that rule.

 

In Solid Edge Synchronous Technology, the design intent is created by the faces that you select to perform your edit. Yes, the design intent is created by the faces you select.  What Live Rules is really doing is helping you to select faces. So if the Maintain Concentric Faces rule is On, then when you select a face, Solid Edge automatically selects all the concentric faces as well. And then you might move all of those faces one direction or another, or you might tilt the faces in a particular direction. This is why you can make edits in Solid Edge that you would probably not even consider in Works. Not to say you couldn’t do them in Works, just that it would be one step in Edge and maybe 4 steps in Works.

 

Look at this part to the right. Without measuring exactly, what kind of relationships can you assume? The hole is concentric with the rounded end. The sides are parallel. The base faces are coplanar. All rounds are tangent. The side faces are orthogonal to the main faces. If you change the model with those assumptions, you’re doing just what Live Rules does. So if you cancel one of those assumptions, like the parallel side assumption, and then move the hole, you’ll get a part shaped like this:

 

Notice at the bottom in the Live Rules panel, that the green items are the rules that are turned on and being used. The red one is one that is turned off, and would effect the result if it were on, and the orange onesare turned on, but they are not having any effect.

 

So right now we are only using the Concentric and Tangent rules. Parallel is turned off, so the sides that were parallel in the image above are no longer parallel because I told Solid Edge not to include the parallel faces.

 

For this example, I’m just moving the hole. The hole is concentric with the round between the angled sides, so that’s selected because of the Concentric rule. The side faces are changing because they are selected because of the Tangent rule.

 

If you turned the Parallel rule back on, the edit looks like this:

 

The Live rules icons on the panel are (in rows, top, then bottom):

 

 

 

As you can see, there are a lot of rules. More than you might have thought, and it might be kind of tough to imagine what some of these rules do. There is no doubt that Live Rules is a subject that varies from the very simple (concentric) to the more esoteric (Canted Coplanar Axes), and you should approach it that way. Don’t try to use all of these rules the first time you jump in. I think it’s best to start simple and work your way up with these things. You will eventually be a master, or maybe you’ll never need more than four or five of these.

 

In an earlier article, I wrote about the best way to use Synchronous Technology. I wrote that I thought using PMI dimensions first, then face relations is the best way to start. Once you have a good grasp of those, move up to Live Rules. Remember that fillets and rounds change the whole ballgame when it comes to Sync and Live Rules. This is why I recommend rounds be made at the end of the tree as Ordered features rather than Synchronous features.

 

Anyway, I’m going to have to come back to this topic, as this article is too long already. Next time we’ll work with some more complex examples, and start using more complex Live Rules.

 

PS: In case you haven’t guessed, reader comments make blog posts more valuable. I encourage you to comment on this, even show examples of why you might disagree with something I said.

Comments
by Phenom
on ‎10-18-2013 06:31 AM

Matt,

 

Nice job as always. Getting a full grasp of ALL the Live Rules takes time. I'm still ham-fisted when I use them... making many mistakes. But most are made in regards to which "PLANE" the selected LR is controlling. I seem to waste a lot of time trying to figure out the orientation of the Part I'm editing, in relationship to the part's Coordinate/Plane system. ST6 has done a better job of illustrating offending surface and features, but the orientation to PLANES in some of Live Rules are still a bit cryptic.... at least to me.

 

Below is what I'd like to see when hovering over a particular Live Rule that controlled by a Plane. ST6 still uses the 1960's X-Y designation in the pop-up dialog screen, which works, but NOT as efficient as it could be if it were more VISUAL.

So as shown above, there are 2 different orientations on the Coordinate System. Is LR using the Screen CS or the Part... they aren't in the same orientation are they?  Obviously it's the Part right!  Well what if the Part CS is turned OFF or buried under geometry?  Point is to Stop and re-orientate yourself to the Parts CS, is probably the only thing Live Rules needs to be easier for folks to learn.

 

SE Development needs to remember that working in 3D is a visual experience. Since READING uses another part of the Brain then Visual responses it is simply a "distraction" from the flow.... it's like Texting while Driving. So STOP making the user go back and forth to absorb which Plane that the LR is dealing with.

 

There's tons of data on the differences from Visual versus Reading stimuli but here's one quote from an article with many well researched sources:

 

"Relatively speaking, in terms of communication, textual ubiquity is brand new. Thanks to millions of years of evolution, we are genetically wired to respond differently to visuals than text."             http://www.billiondollargraphics.com/infographics.html

 

 

Bob

 

 

 

 

 

by Phenom
on ‎10-18-2013 06:42 AM

Bob,

 

This coordinate system issue is made more painful because SE doesn't dim or glass-out other coordinate systems when diving down to make an Edit-In-Place while in an assembly. If you've got a few instances of the part you're editing, prepare to have your head spinning to figure out which is the REAL one!

 

-Dylan

by Phenom
on ‎10-18-2013 01:10 PM

Matt,

 

This is a good article as always. Two years ago I did a video about LR.

It can be useful for users (not for children Smiley Happy):

 

Bob,

I understand your problem, unfortunately SE contains some "inconsistent things", but if we log them they will "repair" and improve them. They know "2x (senior and junior) Mileti moment"! Smiley Wink

 

BR,

Imi

 

 

Labels