08-01-2018 04:28 AM - edited
Hi everyone,
I'm having issues understanding how contact forces are calculated in the component"PLMCONT0 - contact between 2 contours".
In 3D,we usually calculate a force using F=P*S where S is the contact surface between two bodies.
I don't get how AMESim can compute a contact force in 2D. We define two shapes in the x y plan but there is no parameter refering to the depth of parts.
For exemple, if two cylinders are in contact, the resulting contact force will depend on the length of cylinders (the contact force will be greater if the length of the cylinder is 1cm and smaller if the lenth is 1m).
I can't find a way to set the depth of my parts. Or maybe the force is independant of the depth according to equations used in the model? I feel like i have something missing in my model.
I read through Amehelp about 2D contact and found some equations:
* Contact force module F0: F0 = E1.a1 + E2.a2
* Linear penetration p : p = 2.(E1.a1 +E2.a2)/( (E1+E2).L )
Areas (a1 & a2) used in equations are the "intersection area between the shape and contact segmen"
Any ideas on how to take the depth of parts into account?
Thank you for your help
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-02-2018 05:58 AM
Hi DelphinO
You well understood the 2D contact. This component don't take into account the depth of parts.
The 2D contact is a good way to find reaction force but not to predict the linear penetration length because this last one depends on depth of parts as you mention.
If you want to take into account the depth you can increase Young modulus and the maximum stiffness by twice to reduce the linear penetration length by arround twice.
08-03-2018 01:59 PM
Hi Pschyt,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Correct me if I'm wrong, the unit of the Young modulus is N/m in AMESim. Does it mean that the contact force is calculated as if parts were 1m depth?
If it's the case, if my part is 0,5m depth, I should divide the Young modulus and the solid stiffness by 2, right?
(In 3D: As the depth is reduced, the contact force will be greater so the deformation. To take this into account in my model, the only way would be to reduce the Young modulus and the solid stiffness.)
And by the way, why would we change those two parameters at the same time? Shouldn't it be one or the other?
Thank you for your help
08-06-2018 06:45 AM - edited 08-06-2018 06:47 AM
Hello Delphine,
I also had some difficulties to understand this submodel, but after using it a few time, I came up with a method to parameter it properly:
I had great results with this method, the mechanism I simulated always provided results close to tests, and I could give design insghts to the conception team.
Then to answer your questions, I would say the "young modulus" parameter is not truly the young modulus, I don't really know why it is named that way, but for me it is not that a big of a deal as you can still get very good results.
Also I use AMESim v16 and the parameter unit is properly set to N/m², maybe it is a bug the dev team corrected.
Finally I would say do not be concerned too much with the deformation of the shapes, it is not finite element analysis, your main focus shlould be: proper dynamic behavior, and fast simulation time.
I hope this will help you in your work
08-21-2018 05:17 AM
Hi Hazzar,
As I can't conduct test on my mechanism, it is quite hard to predict its dynamic behavior. As you suggested, I kept on running simulations using different parameters to select the ones that seem to give a realistic behavior. I should be quite close to what we can expect now. I wanted to be sure that there wasn't another way to set the parameters and that I didn't misunderstand something throughout the modeling process.
I also asked the development team how to include the third dimension in my model and they simply said that it is not possible. There is the "3D mechanical" library but it can't model contact between two cylinders.
Thanks a lot for your help!