turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- Testing Knowledge Base
- Calculating damage with Miner’s Rule

- Article History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content

Siemens Valued Contributor

07-11-2016
11:00 AM

Miner’s Rule is used to calculate damage caused by cyclic/time variant loading. It is a linear damage accumulation model that uses a load time history and SN-Curve as inputs to calculate damage.

When damage is equal to “1”, failure occurs. The definition of failure for a physical part varies. It could mean that a crack has initiated on the surface of the part. It could also mean that a crack has gone completely thru the part, separating it. In this article, a conservative approach to failure will be used: a crack starts to appear on the surface of the part.

Applying a constant amplitude, cyclical stress to a metal coupon causes it to fail (a crack appears) after a specific number of cycles. Stress is defined as Force (F) divided by Area (A) or F/A.

By repeating this test at different stress levels, one could develop a material SN-curve. For example the SN-curve* may look like this:

SN-Curves are developed with testing machines that apply constant amplitude loads. They can be axial loads, torsional loads, bending loads, etc. Different stress levels are tested and the number of cycles to failure are recorded.

**Damage Accumulation**

When a physical part undergoes stress cycles**, Miner’s Rule works like this:

On the left graph, there is a loading time history. The SN-Curve is the middle graph, and a damage tally is kept on the right side.

In this case, two cycles at a specific amplitude are applied to the part. At this amplitude the part could take 6 cycles before it would fail. Dividing two cycles by six cycles, the accumulated damage is 0.33. A third of the life of the part has been used.

Two more cycles of a higher amplitude are applied. At this higher amplitude, four cycles would be required for failure to occur. Dividing two cycles by four cycles, an additional 0.5 of damage has occured. The total accumulated damage is now 0.83. According to Miner’s Rule, no failure has occurred.

One more cycle of the higher amplitude is now applied. The accumulated damage is now 1.08. Failure has occurred!

**History**

In 1945, M. A. Miner popularized a rule that had first been proposed by A. Palmgren in 1924. The rule is variously called Miner's rule or the Palmgren-Miner linear damage hypothesis.

**Limitations of Miner's Rule**

Miner's Rule does not take into account the sequencing or order in which in the cyclic loads are applied. For example, if loads are applied in the plastic region, the endurance limit is no longer in effect.

**Other Notes**

*Note: Real SN curves for metals are log-log curves and easily range into millions of cycles.

**Note: The loads applied to product in the real world are usually not constant amplitude cycles. To break down a real world load history into cycles, a cycle counting method called 'Rainflow Analysis' is used.

**Questions? **Contact Us!

**More Fatigue and Durability links: **

- Siemens LMS Durability testing solutions
- Stress and Strain
- Rainflow Counting
- Calculating fatigue damage with LMS Tecware ProcessBuilder
- What is a SN-Curve?
- Measuring strain gauges with LMS Test.Lab
- Goodman-Haigh Diagram for Infinite Life
- Rosette strain gauges
- What is a Power Spectral Density?
- History of Fatigue

**Other Articles:**

Labels:

- Article History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content

Related content

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2018 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc