Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Navigation
- Simcenter
- Forums
- Blogs
- Knowledge Bases

- Siemens PLM Community
- Simcenter
- Testing Knowledge Base
- Dynamic Stiffness, Compliance, Mobility, and more....

- Article History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dynamic Stiffness, Compliance, Mobility, and more...

Siemens Phenom

02-28-2019
12:38 AM

A Frequency Response Function (FRF) gives insight into a structure’s natural frequencies, damping, and mode shapes.

Often, the FRF is displayed with units of acceleration (g) over units of force (N) resulting in an accelerance unit of g/N.

However, there are alternative formats with which the FRF can be displayed (*Figure 1*). These alternative formats are created by performing math operations on the FRF:

- Integration and differentiation*: Acceleration can be changed to velocity or displacement
- Inversion: The FRF can be inverted, so it is input over output, rather than output over input

(*) In frequency domain, integration and differentiation simply boils down to respectively division and multiplication by jω, where ω is the frequency in radians per second.

There are specific names for each format of the FRF: Dynamic Stiffness, Compliance, Mobility, Accelerance, Mechanical Impedence, and Dynamic Mass. There are benefits to displaying the FRF in these different formats, which are discussed in the article below. All of these terms are mathematically related, so by calculating one FRF, any of the other representations can be determined.

In Simcenter Testlab, it is easy to move between these different functions by integrating or differentiating in the FRF plot display (see last section of article).

This article covers:

* 1. Theory and Background*

* 2. Accelerance*

* 3. Dynamic Mass*

* 4. Mobility*

* 5. Mechanical Impedance*

* 6. Compliance*

* 7. Dynamic Stiffness*

* 8. FRF forms in Simcenter Testlab*

* 8.1 Testlab Displays: Processing*

* 8.2 Testlab Impact Testing*

**1. Theory and Background**

A single degree of freedom (SDOF) system, consisting of a mass-spring-damper, is often used to understand dynamic systems and their properties as shown in *Figure 2*.

In the mass-spring-damper system:

- m – mass of the system [kg]
- c – damping of system [Ns/m]
- k – stiffness [N/m]
- f – force applied to system [N]
- x – displacement [m]

As a function of frequency, this mass-spring-damper system has a peak response (x) due to the force (f) at the natural frequency (ωn). The natural frequency of the mass spring system is equal to the square root of the stiffness over the mass as given in *Equation 1*.

The FRF of such a system is shown in *Figure 3*. The behavior of the system can be broken into three regions:

- Stiffness – Below the natural frequency, the stiffness governs the response of the SDOF system
- Damping – At the natural frequency, the damping governs the response of the SDOF system
- Mass – Above the natural frequency, the mass governs the response of the SDOF system

The equation of motion (*Equation 2*) as a function of frequency (ω, in radian per second) for the SDOF system is:

Rearranging the equation to an output divided by input, and taking the frequency toward zero, the equation at low frequencies becomes one over the stiffness (1/k) as shown in *Equation 3*.

Expressing the same equation in acceleration over force (by double differentiating the displacement), and taking the frequency to infinity, the equation simplifies to 1/m (*Equation 4*).

No matter what form the FRF is displayed in, the frequencies below the natural frequency in FRF are dominated by stiffness, while the frequencies above the natural frequency are dominated by mass.

**2. Accelerance**

A common form to view the FRF in is accelerance, with units of acceleration over force as shown in *Figure 4*.

Below is a plot of accelerance between two points measured on a test structure using an impact hammer and an accelerometer (*Figure 5*).

If measured properly, the peaks in the accelerance FRF correspond to natural frequencies of the test structure.

When physically measuring an FRF, an accelerometer and a force sensor are commonly used. It is therefore easy to understand this FRF form in the terms of the equipment used to make the measurement.

**3. Dynamic Mass**

The dynamic mass FRF (units of acceleration / force) can be calculated by inverting the accelerance FRF, as shown in *Figure 6.*

In a dynamic mass FRF, the data asymptote succeeding the natural frequency is equal to the mass of the SDOF system.

The inverse of the FRF from *Figure 5* is displayed in *Figure 7* below. This is a dynamic mass FRF.

The dips in the dynamic mass FRF correspond to natural frequencies of the test object.

Using the mass lines of FRFs collected from a softly suspended test object, the moments of inertia of the object can be calculated (*Figure 8*). Moments of inertia can be calculated from FRFs using the Simcenter Testlab Rigid Body Property calculator software.

The Simcenter Testlab Rigid Body Property calculator takes 37 tokens to run. This method utilizes the rigid body modes of a test object on a soft suspension. The rigid body modes of a freely suspended object should be close to zero Hertz.

There is a frequency range between the rigid body modes and first flexible modes of the object from which the mass properties are calculated as shown in *Figure 9.*

For calculating mass for the moments of inertia, the rigid body modes and flexible modes need to be sufficiently spaced apart. In the FRF, there needs to be a constant amplitude mass line originating from the rigid body modes before the influence of the stiffness line of the flexible modes is significant.

Flexible modes of the structure (bending, torsion, local modes, etc) cannot be used to calculate the moments of inertia. For example, a local panel flexible mode mass line does not contain the mass information of the entire object's inertia. The rigid body modes are required because the entire test object rotates and translates.

**4. Mobility**

Mobility is another popular form in which to display the FRF. Mobility uses units of velocity over force as shown in *Figure 10.*

For SDOF systems, and systems with lightly damped, well-spaced modes, the asymptotes preceding and succeeding the natural frequency are again significant.

The asymptote preceding the natural frequency linearly increases with frequency and is inversely proportional to the stiffness value. The slope of the asymptote succeeding the natural frequency decreases with frequency and is inversely proportional to the mass.

In *Figure 11* below is the same FRF as in *Figure 5*, but now displayed in terms of mobility. This was done by doing a single integration (i.e. division by jω).

Mobility can be a popular form due to various physical phenomenon being proportional to velocity. For example, the sound radiated by a surface is directly proportional to the velocity of vibration on said surface.

Using Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) modeling (*Figure 12*), the mobility between the surface velocity and internal forces would be evaluated as part of the modelling process.

To ensure that a product has the lowest sound level possible, the surface velocities need to be minimized. Product designs with the lowest amplitude mobility FRFs between internal forces and sound radiating surfaces are preferred.

**5. Mechanical Impedance**

Mechanical impedance is a measure of how much a structure resists motion when subjected to a unit force. Impedance is defined as the force over velocity FRF (f/v) as shown in *Figure 13.*

A mechanical impedance FRF is shown in *Figure 14*. This is the same FRF as shown in *Figure 5*, but it has been integrated once and inverted.

In a mechanical impedance FRF, the dips correspond to natural frequencies of the test article.

One use for mechanical impedance is determining the operational forces on a structure. For example, if the mechanical impedance of a structure is known; that structure is placed on a vibrating support; and the operational velocity of the structure can be measured (often with a laser), the operational forces can be calculated as:

- f_operational = v_operational * (f/v)

Another way in which mechanical impedance is used in practice is to determine how two different components will interact with one another in an assembly. The coupling point FRFs of the two components can be overlaid as shown in *Figure 15.*

If the FRFs are well separated in amplitude, then the two components will not interact dynamically. If they are close together, then dynamic interaction occurs between the two components.

**6. Compliance**

Compliance is a measure of how much a structure moves (displacement, x) for a unit input of force (f) as shown in *Figure 16.*

For SDOF system and systems with lightly damped, well-spaced modes, the asymptotes preceding and succeeding the natural frequency are again significant. The line preceding the natural frequency is known as the “stiffness line”.

When displayed in compliance terms, the stiffness line is approximately flat and equal to the inverse stiffness value of the system.

Compliance can be calculated from accelerance by double integrating (*Figure 17*).

Compliance is often used, as it is an intuitive quantity to understand. It is more intuitive to think about deflections/displacements rather than acceleration or velocity. It can be difficult to physically measure displacement per unit of input force. However, compliance is often used in CAE modeling.

The accelerance versus compliance format of the same FRF are overlaid in *Figure 18* below.

Notice that the compliance FRF becomes progressively lower in amplitude as the frequency increases, while the accelerance FRF does not. This is because the compliance FRF amplitude is being divided by the square of the frequency relative to the accelerance FRF.

**7. Dynamic Stiffness**

Stiffness, or the resistance to deformation from an input force (*Figure 19*), is very important in structural dynamics and noise and vibration related topics. Vibration can be thought of as a ratio of the forces acting on a structure to its stiffness.

Stiffness is especially important when considering elastomeric mounts and mounting locations. Mount manufacturers often work in dynamic stiffness, rather than accelerance or mobility.

A FRF in dynamic stiffness format is shown in *Figure 20.*

Oftentimes, noise and vibration engineers will use dynamic stiffness to determine where to place an isolator. The attachment location should be at least ten times stiffer than the isolator (for example, a rubber mount bushing) as shown in *Figure 21*.

If the attachment location and mount isolator stiffness are similar, then the isolator is not effective. It does not isolate the vibration at the connection. Think of pushing on two springs that are in series. If one spring is soft and the other stiff, the soft spring will deflect while the stiff spring does not move. If both springs are of the same stiffness, they both will move and deflect.

Alternatively, manufacturers may come up with a “stiffness target” for the mount attachment location. A single number can be used for the target because the stiffness values are flat versus frequency when using dynamic stiffness.

For example, a common target for attachment location stiffness is around 1X10^7 N/m for general mechanical attachments (spring/mount brackets, etc). The manufacturer may create a reference curve for stiffness and overlay the FRF onto this reference curve (see *Figure 22,* below).

The attachment locations can be evaluated for their stiffness. The higher the amplitude of a dynamic stiffness FRF, the more stiff the attachment location. In *Figure 22*, the FRF with black linestyle is well below the desired stiffness, and signficantly less stiff than the FRF with blue linestyle.

By modal curvefitting a dynamic stiffness FRF, the intersection of the stiffness line with zero Hertz can be plotted. This can be used to determine the static stiffness of the test object.

**8. FRF forms in Simcenter Testlab**

It is simple to move between forms of the FRF in Simcenter Testlab.

*8.1 Testlab Displays: Processing*

Click on the y-axis of the FRF, and chose “Processing”. Then choose to integrate or differentiate to move between the different forms as shown in *Figure 23.*

The units are obviously automatically changed, but can be adjusted within the same quantity case (e.g. going from g/N to (m/s2)/N for accelerance FRFs; or from m/N to mm/N for compliance FRFs).

*8.2 Testlab Impact Testing*

Additionally, it is possible to directly calculate dynamic stiffness in the Simcenter Testlab Impact Testing workbook as shown in *Figure 24.*

In the “Measure” workbook of Simcenter Testlab:

- In the upper right of the workbook, select “All Settings”.
- In the pop-up window, select to calculate dynamic stiffness in the Data Storage section. \

The “All Settings” dialog is available in both the Measure and Impact Setup worksheets.

*Testlab Data Calculator for Block Math*

* *

It is also possible to use the Data Calculator to invert and integrate FRFs. In the Testlab Desktop Navigator, click on the Data Calculator as shown in *Figure 25*.

Enter either the INVERSE or INTEGRATE formula as needed (*Figure 26*).

A detailed example of how to use the Data Calculator can be found in this Testing Forum post.

Questions? Email peter.schaldenbrand@siemens.com

**Modal Data Acquisition:**

- Simcenter Testlab Impact Testing
- Modal Impact Testing: User Defined Impact Sequence
- What modal impact hammer tip should I use?
- Modal Tips: Roving hammer versus roving accelerometer
- Modal Testing: Driving Point Survey – What’s at stake?
- Attach Modal Shaker at Stiff or Flexible Area of Stucture?
- Using Pseudo-Random for high quality FRF measurements
- Multi Input Multi Output MIMO Testing
- Ground Vibration Testing and Flutter

**Modal Analysis and Operational Deflection Shapes:**

- Natural Frequency and Resonance
- What is Frequency Response Function (FRF)?
- How to calculate damping from a FRF?
- Getting Started with Modal Curvefitting
- Modal Assurance Criterion
- Simcenter Testlab Modal Analysis: Modification Prediction
- Import CAD into Simcenter Testlab
- Animate CAD Geometry
- Alias Table: Mapping Test Data to Geometry
- Geometry in Simcenter Testlab
- Maximum Likelihood estimation of a Modal Model (MLMM)
- Difference Between Residues and Residuals?
- What is an Operational Deflection Shape (ODS)?
- Making a Video of a Time Animation

Labels:

Comments

Sheila_B_Wright

Dreamer

- Mark as Read
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

04-26-2019
05:20 PM

CharlesR

Siemens Valued Contributor

- Mark as Read
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

04-26-2019
05:28 PM

Hi Sheila_B_Wright

Here are a few points regarding your question...

- For a FRF function, the RMS/peak/peak-to-peak is not applicable.
- The FRF is the ratio of two measured quantities, in your case displacement and force.
- The RMS/peak/peak-to-peak applies to the displacement and force functions individually. Both force and displacement are measured the same way.
- This means that if they were both measured peak-to-peak, they would each be twice than if they were measured peak. When you divide the displacement by force, the factor of 2 divides out.

The settings for RMS/peak/peak-to-peak effect the individual measurements, for example, below is a RMS measured force spectrum. Note on the Y-axis the RMS is indicated, while in the FRF display it is not.

Because these quantities are related by a known scale factor, you can also adjust them in the display by right clicking on the Y-axis.

I hope that answers your question ...

- Article History
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content

Related content

Follow Siemens PLM Software

© 2019 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc